The virtual panopticon and the banalization of social risks: Qualitative evidence about algorithmic decision-making in Belgian municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32826/reyf.v3i7.387Keywords:
Belgium, Subnational level, Banalization, Public reason, AlgorithmsAbstract
The development of algorithms and data in Belgium has received some attention in recent years, but philosophical considerations have been left aside from the discussion. This work aims to fill this gap by investigating how public reason can interact with algorithms in Belgium. The approach is twofold. First, we develop a theoretical framework to construct the concept of public reason, which is expected to be aligned with the current stage and development of technology. Second, we test this framework using data from public administration at subnational level for three Belgian local authorities, Liège (Wallonia), Namur (Wallonia), and Antwerp (Flanders). By means of a qualitative approach based on interviews, we find how algorithms and data reduce men into simplified singularities and then provoke a “banalization” of public reason. This banalization of public reason leads to a banalization of local social risks.
References
Arendt, H. (2002). Eichmann à Jérusalem : Rapport sur la banalité du mal [Eichmann in Jerusalem : A report on the Banality of Evil]. Editions Gallimard. Coll. “Fo-lio/Histoire”.
Barbero, J., & Rodríguez-Crespo, E. (2022). Technologi-cal, institutional, and geographical peripheries: regional development and risk of poverty in the European re-gions. The Annals of Regional Science, 69, 311-332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-022-01127-9
Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society : Towards a New Modernity. SAGE Publications.
Châtelet, F. (1992). Une histoire de la Raison : Entretiens avec Emile Noël [A history of Reason : Interviews with Emile Noël]. Editions Seuil.
Boyne, R. (2000). Post-Panopticism. Economy, and Socie-ty, 29(2), 285-307
Crespo Cuaresma, J., & Lutz, S. U. (2021). Modelling and projecting digital trends in European regions: an econ-ometric framework. Regional Studies, 55(10-11), 1696-1710.
European Commission. (2022). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). https://gdpr.eu/tag/gdpr/
Foucault, M. (1986). Omnes et singulatim : vers une cri-tique de la Raison politique [Omnes et singulatim : to-wards a criticism of political Reason]. Le débat, (41), 5-36.
Foucault, M. (2004). Sécurité, Territoire, Population. Cours au Collège de France. 1977-1978 [Security, Terri-tory, Population. Lectures at the Collège de France. 1977-1978]. Editions Gallimard Seuil.
Foucault, M. (2020). Surveiller et punir [Discipline and punish]. Editions Gallimard. Coll. “Tel”.
Gandy Jr., O. (2021). The Panoptic Sort. Oxford University Press.
Habermas, J. (1988). Le discours philosophique de la modernité : douze conférences [The philosophical dis-course of modernity : twelve lectures]. Editions Galli-mard.
Haeri, M. A., Hartmann, K., Sirsch, J., Wenzelburger, G., & Zweig, K. A. (2022). Promises and Pitfalls of Algorithm Use by State Authorities. Philosophy & Technology, 35(2), 1-31.
Hegel, G.W. (2012). La Raison dans l’Histoire [Reason in History]. Editions Pocket. Coll. “Agora”.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (2020). La dialectique de la raison. Fragments philosophiques [Dialectic of Enlight-enment]. Editions Gallimard. Coll. “Tel”.
König, P. D., & Wenzelburger, G. (2021). The legitimacy gap of algorithmic decision-making in the public sector: Why it arises and how to address it. Technology in So-ciety, 67, 101688.
Koulu, R. (2020). Human control over automation: EU policy and AI ethics. European Journal of Legal Studies, 12 (1), 9-46. https://doi.org/10.2924/EJLS.2oi9.oi9
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of au-tomated decision-making in democratic settings. Tele-communications policy, 44(6), 101976.
Loi relative à la protection des personnes physiques à l’égard des traitements de données à caractère per-sonnel [Law related to the protection of physical per-sons regarding the treatment of data related to priva-cy], Titre 2. — De la protection des personnes phy-siques à l’égard du traitement des données à caractère personnel par les autorités compétentes à des fins de prévention et de détection des infractions pénales, d’enquêtes et de poursuites en la matière ou d’exécution de sanctions pénales, y compris la protec-tion contre les menaces pour la sécurité publique et la prévention de telles menaces, chapitre II. — Principes de traitement, Art. 35 (2018). https://www.autoriteprotectiondonnees.be/publications/loi-cadre.pdf
Lotka, A. (1945). The law of evolution as a maximal prin-ciple. Human biology, 17 (3), 167-194.
Lyon, D. (2004). The Electronic Eye. The rise of surveil-lance society. Polity Press.
Malgieri, G. (2019). Automated decision-making in the EU member states: The right to explanation and other “suitable safeguards” in the national legislations. Com-puter Law & Security Review, 35 (5), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.05.002
Mathiesen, T. (1997). The viewer society: Michel Fou-cault’s ‘Panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical criminology, 1(2), 215-234.
Matz, V. (2021). Proposition de loi modifiant la loi relative à la publicité de l’administration du 11 avril 1994 afin d’introduire une plus grande transparence dans l’usage des algorithmes par les administrations [Proposition of law modifying the law related to the publicity of the administration of March 11, 1994, to introduce a greater transparency in the usage of algorithms by administra-tions]. La Chambre des Représentants. https://www.lachambre.be/FLWB/PDF/55/1904/55K1904001.pdf
McMullan, T. (2015). What does the Panopticon mean in the age of digital surveillance? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/23/panopticon-digital-surveillance-jeremy-bentham
Nietzsche, F. (1997). Le Gai Savoir [The Gay Science]. Editions Flammarion.
Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2010). Le nouveau pouvoir statistique [The new statistical Power]. Multitudes, (1), 88-103. https://doi.org/10.3917/mult.040.0088
Rouvroy, A. (2011). Governmentality in an age of auto-nomic computing: Technology, virtuality and utopia. Law, Human Agency and Autonomic Computing, Routledge, 119-139.
Rouvroy, A., & Berns, T. (2013). Gouvernementalité algo-rithmique et perspectives d’émancipation [Algorithmic governmentality and emancipatory perspectives]. Ré-seaux, (1), 163-196. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163
Rouvroy, A. (2020). Algorithmic governmentality and the death of politics. Green European Journal, 27.
Schleife, K. (2010). What really matters: Regional versus individual determinants of the digital divide in Germa-ny. Research Policy, 39(1), 173-185.
Stiegler, B. (2020). Bifurquer : « Il n’y a pas d’alternative » [To fork : « There is no alternative »]. Editions Les liens qui libèrent.
Szeles, M. R. (2018). New insights from a multilevel ap-proach to the regional digital divide in the European Union. Telecommunications Policy, 42(6), 452-463.
Vicente, M. R., & López, A. J. (2011). Assessing the re-gional digital divide across the European Union-27. Tel-ecommunications Policy, 35(3), 220-237.
Weizenbaum, J. (1972). On the Impact of the Computer on Society. Science, 176 (4035), 609-614.
Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer power and human reason: From judgement to calculation. W.H. Freeman and company.
Wiener, N. (1960). Moral and Technical consequences of Automation. Science, 131 (3410), 1355-1358.
Wilson, C., & Van Der Velden, M. (2022). Sustainable AI: An integrated model to guide public sector decision-making. Technology in Society, 68, 101926.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever its author is indicated and its first publication is this magazine.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication is indicated in this magazine.
- Authors are allowed and advised to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access ).
