Endogenous Aggregate Beliefs: Equity Trading under Heterogeneity in Ambiguity Aversion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32826/reyf.v2i4.365Keywords:
Ambiguity aversion, Agent heterogeneity, Asset pricing, Portfolio choice, Wealth distributionAbstract
We build a simple and tractable model of consumer heterogeneity in ambiguity aversion and use it to illustrate how asymmetric beliefs in the asset markets affect the dynamics of asset pricing, portfolio allocation, and the wealth distribution. The model is an otherwise canonical exchange-economy setting with two aggregate states of nature and two assets. The key focus is on how asset prices, when subjected to ambiguity, behave very differently in the short run than in the long run. In the short run, heterogeneity plays an important role. In the long run, belief heterogeneity persists, but the wealth distribution has evolved so that only the least ambiguity-averse investors matter for prices. As part of the short-run dynamics, the model can generate endogenous aggregate movements in non-participation—a drastic form of trading less—in response to ambiguity, with strong depressing effects on asset prices.
References
Aiyagari, S. Rao (1994): “Uninsured Idiosyncratic Risk and Aggregate Saving”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(3), pp. 659–684.
Angeletos, George-Marios and Jennifer La’O (2009): “Noisy Business Cycles”, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2009.
Alonso, Irasema and Roman Sysuyev (2009): “Ambiguity in a Two-Country World", Columbia University.
Alonso, Irasema and Mauricio Prado (2015): “Ambiguity Aversion, Asset Prices, and the Welfare Costs of Aggregate Fluctuations", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 51, 79-92.
Borovička, Jaroslav (2015): “Survival and Long-Run Dynamics with Heterogeneous Beliefs under Recursive Preferences", mimeo, New York University.
Coen-Pirani, Daniele (2004): “Effects of Differences in Risk Aversion on the Distribution of Wealth", Macroeconomic Dynamics, 8, 617-632.
Colacito, Riccardo and Mariano Massimiliano Croce (2014): “Recursive Allocations and Wealth Distribution with Multiple Goods: Existence, Survivorship, and Dynamics", mimeo, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Condie, Scott (2008): “Living with Ambiguity: Prices and Survival when Investors Have Heterogeneous Preferences for Ambiguity", Economic Theory, 36, 81-108.
Cvitanić, Jakša and Semyon Malamud (2011): “Price Impact and Portfolio Impact", Journal of Financial Economics, 100, 201-225.
Epstein, Larry G. and Jianjun Miao (2003): “A Two-person Dynamic Equilibrium under Ambiguity", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 27, 1253-1288.
Epstein, Larry G. and Martin Schneider (2003): “Recursive Multiple-Priors", Journal of Economic Theory, 113, 1-31.
Epstein, Larry G. and Martin Schneider (2007): “Learning under Ambiguity", Review of Economic Studies, 74, 1275-1303.
Epstein, Larry G. and Martin Schneider (2008): “Ambiguity, Information Quality and Asset Pricing", Journal of Finance, 63, 197-228.
Epstein, Larry G. and Tan Wang (1994): “Intertemporal Asset Pricing under Knightian Uncertainty," Econometrica 62, 283-322.
Fostel, Ana and John Geanakoplos (2008): “Leverage Cycles and the Anxious Economy”, American Economic Review, 98, 1211-1244.
Gilboa, Itzhak and David Schmeidler (1989): “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility Without Additivity", Econometrica, 57, 571-587.
Guerdjikova, Ani and Emanuela Sciubba (2015): “Survival with Ambiguity", Journal of Economic Theory, 155, 50-94.
Hatchondo, Juan Carlos (2008): “Asymmetric Information and the Lack of Portfolio Diversification”, International Economic Review 49(4), 1297-1330.
Hatchondo, Juan Carlos, Per Krusell and Martin Schneider (2014): “Asset Trading and Valuation with Uncertain Exposure”, working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, IIES, and Stanford University.
Huggett, Mark (1993), “The risk-free rate in heterogeneous-agent incomplete-insurance economies”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 17(5-6), 953–969.
Kocherlakota, Narayana R. (1996): “The Equity Premium: It’s Still A Puzzle", Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 42-71.
Krusell, Per and Anthony A. Smith, Jr. (1998), “Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy”, Journal of Political Economy 106:5, 867–896.
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. (2003): “Macroeconomic Priorities", American Economic Review, 93, 1-14.
Lucas, Robert E. Jr. and Nancy Stokey (1984): “Optimal Growth with Many Consumers", Journal of Economic Theory, 32, 139–171.
Mehra, Rajnish and Edward C. Prescott (1985): “The Equity Premium: A Puzzle", Journal of Monetary Economics, 15, 145-161.
Piketty, Thomas (2014): Capital in the Twenty-First Century, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Sandroni, Alvaro (2000): “Do Markets Favor Agents Able to Make Accurate Predictions?"’, Econometrica, 68, 1303-1341.
Yan, Hongjun (2008): “Natural Selection in Financial Markets: Does It Work?", Management Science, 54, 1935-1950.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Those authors who have publications with this journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the journal the right of first publication of their work, which will be simultaneously subject to the Creative Commons Recognition License that allows third parties to share the work whenever its author is indicated and its first publication is this magazine.
- Authors may adopt other non-exclusive licensing agreements for the distribution of the published work (eg, deposit it in an institutional telematic file or publish it in a monographic volume) whenever the initial publication is indicated in this magazine.
- Authors are allowed and advised to disseminate their work through the Internet (eg in institutional telematic files or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase the citations of the published work. (See The effect of open access ).
